Dual 510(K) and CLIA Waiver Submission

Dual 510k and CLIA Waiver Applications

A dual 510k and CLIA waiver submission is a combined regulatory process aimed at obtaining both FDA clearance and CLIA waiver for an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical device. This approach allows a manufacturer to streamline the clearance process for devices intended for use in various clinical settings, including point-of-care locations such as physician offices and pharmacies.

When and why a dual submission required?

Dual submission is required when a manufacturer wishes to apply for both a CLIA waiver application and a 510(k) submission simultaneously.

By submitting both the FDA 510k and CLIA Waiver applications at the same time, manufacturers can get their products to market faster. The FDA can review both applications together, which saves time compared to reviewing them one after the other.

Who is eligible to apply dual submission?

The FDA categorizes clinical laboratory tests by their complexity—from the least to the most complex:

  • Waived tests (Ex: urine pregnancy test, rapid strep tests, glucometer)
  • Moderate complexity test (Ex: chemistry panels, complete blood counts, PCR testing, urine dipsticks)
  • High complexity test (Ex: cytology, flow cytometry, most molecular diagnostic tests, genetics tests)

 

When a manufacturer of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices believes that the device is simple enough to obtain a CLIA waiver and also initially categorized as moderate complexity but meets the criteria for the waived test can apply for a CLIA Waiver by submitting a CLIA Waiver by Application (CW) to the FDA.

Who benefits from waived test

When a test is categorized as waived, it allows that test to be performed by laboratories with a Certificate of Waiver (COW) or a Certificate for Provider Performed Microscopy (PPM) in addition to the other CLIA Certificate types.

How to apply dual CLIA Waiver submission?

Manufacturers are required to submit a Pre-submission and inform the FDA of its intention to submit a Dual 510(k) and CLIA Waiver application before making a dual submission. The FDA recommends using the Pre-Submission process to discuss intended study designs.

Process of a Dual Submission

CLIA waiver protocols and applications:

FDA determines the CLIA categorization at the time of review submission (510k or PMA). FDA create a submission tracking number for the CLIA process and notifies the sponsor of their CLIA record (CR) number in addition to the premarket number. FDA will notify sponsors of the categorization within 2 weeks of the premarket decision. CLIA waiver by application should reference a cleared/approved marketing application (e.g.: 510k, PMA). In case premarket submission is reviewed by another FDA centre, the other centre will notify CDRH

Database for CLIA categorization of IVD devices

In a CLIA waiver by application, a manufacturer must submit evidence to the FDA that their test was previously cleared or approved categorized as moderate complexity but meets CLIA waiver statutory criteria and request the FDA to categorize the test as waived.

CLIA Waivers by Application are not accepted for devices that are under premarket review at the time of submission. A Dual 510(k) and CLIA Waiver by Application should contain the complete 510(k) and waiver application in a single submission.

Study requirements:

In a dual submission, the manufacturer must include comparison and reproducibility studies. Such studies should be conducted by the intended user (i.e. untrained test operators) for a CLIA waiver and trained operators for 510(K).

An applicant may choose to conduct a single set of comparison and reproducibility studies with untrained operators to satisfy certain requirements to establish both substantial equivalence

Free Quote
Get accurate and detailed 510k quote
More details

Content of a Dual Submission

A dual submission should contain the following information:

  • A single set of comparison and reproducibility studies that are used for supporting both FDA 510k clearance and CLIA waiver.
  • Description of the device that demonstrates it is simple to use
  • Risk Analysis- The results of risk analysis, including the identification of potential sources of error for the device.
  • Failure-Alert and Fail-Safe Mechanisms- The results of risk evaluation and control including a description of
  • Implementation to mitigate the risk of errors, and
  • validation and/or verification studies demonstrating the ability of failure alert, fail-safe mechanisms, and other control measures incorporated into the device to mitigate the risk of errors, even under conditions of stress.
  • Flex studies – The results of flex studies demonstrate the insensitivity of the test system to environmental and usage variations under conditions of stress.
  • Analytical studies- A description of the design and results of studies conducted at an internal site includes:

Analytical sensitivity (Limit of Detection (LoD) or C5-C95 for qualitative tests);

Measuring interval (Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) and Limit of Blank (LoB)/LoD, if applicable, for quantitative tests);

Analytical specificity (interferences, cross-reactivity, etc.);

Linearity (for quantitative tests);

Precision (if needed for lot-to-lot variability and/or other issues);

Carry-over (if applicable);

Reagent stability; and

Sample stability

  • Comparison study- A description of the design and results of studies conducted to demonstrate that the device has an insignificant risk of erroneous results in the hands of the intended user (untrained “operator”).
  • Reproduction study- A description of the design and results of studies conducted in the hands of the intended user (untrained “operator”).
  • Clinical performance study- Most IVD devices do not require a clinical performance study, but some devices require either 510(K) or dual submission.
  • Labeling- Proposed Labeling with instructions for uses consistent with a device that is “simple.”
We have the resources and knowhow with most economic pricing
Read More
Request for Categorization:

In case the device is exempt from the premarket submission but CLIA categorization is needed, manufacturers submit a request to CDRH at the below address with a test package insert with instructions.

Food and Drug Administration

Centre for Devices and Radiological Health, Document Mail Center – WO66-G609, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993-0002

FDA create a submission tracking number for the CLIA process and notify the sponsor of the tracking number and categorization within 30 days of request. FDA will post the categorization in the public CLIA database concerning the CLIA Record (“CR”) number.

CLIA Database: For a list of waived tests sorted by analyte name, visit the FDA website at CLIA – Currently Waived Analytes.Tests that are categorized as waived or non-waived (i.e., moderate or high complexity), refer to the FDA CLIA Database

Quick Contact